Wednesday, May 08, 2019


Back in December of 2016, I got married to a wonderful Filipina named Janet and in the process adopted her equally wonderful daughter Raianne.  I blogged about it at the time here.  However, that ceremony took place in the Philippines because she's a Philippines citizen.  So after that wedding, I had to leave her behind and fly back to Canada to simply carry on with my life.  She and Raianne had to do the same thing with their lives as well.  Long distance relationships never feel good.  Sending and receiving messages to each other online is certainly fun and lifts the spirits, but there's still an emptiness felt throughout simply because this person is so far away.
But, in that time since then, we all completed the necessary paperwork for my wife and daughter to achieve permission to immigrate to Canada to be with me.  This passed January, they were both accepted!!! They were both sad to leave friends and family behind, but at the same time they were also excited to meet the new family and friends that awaited them in Canada.  April 8, one both ago today, was the big day when they finally made the journey.  My wife documented their trip in this video:

 Lots has happened in the first month since they've arrived.  Yes, they've both applied for things that every Canadian citizen needs like SIN numbers and health cards.  Our daughter has also been enrolled in school and is already doing quite well.

Here she is getting a guided tour of the school by some of her new friends.

But it's not just been laboriously filling out forms or listening to stuffy seminars about citizenship.  We've managed to have some fun too.  We went to the Saskatchewan Natural History Museum where Raianne got to look at some real dinosaur bones.

I know that she's interested in science, especially dinosaurs, so I knew this would be a big treat for her.  With that in mind, we also went to the Science Centre.  Raianne enjoyed herself there too.  We watched an IMAX movie about rescue dogs that was quite enjoyable and informative.
However, there was one attraction there that I had particular interest in.  There's something at the Science Centre called a 'zoetrope'.  For those who don't know, that's the device that was used to view animated drawing and/or photographs before film was invented.  Patrons can make their own animations on a slip of paper, put it into the device, then give it a spin and watch it move.  I tried creating what's known in animation circles as a 'walk cycle'.  I brought it home, scanned it into my computer ad put those pictures into Flash so that I could show you fine people on the vast internet my meagre accomplishment.  Here it is embedded below:

On April 28, there was a freak spring snow storm that made it look and feel like winter for just that one day.  Most people from hot climates like the Philippines tend not function well right away in snowy conditions.  They either try to stay inside as much as possible, or they just shiver profusely no matter how many layers of jackets and sweaters they're wearing.  Raianne however took to it naturally.  She sang Elsa's "Let It Go" song the entire time and could've frolicked in that snow all day.  I showed her how to make a snow angel and she did that many times.  Also, at one point she taught herself how to make snow balls and throw them.  One of those snow balls hit me right in the face.  She said "sorry, daddy" but I wasn't mad at all.  If anything I was proud.  In just a short time, she taught herself to throw snowballs at people's faces like a Canadian pro.  That's impressive.  The next snow fall won't be for several months, but I'm sure she will not have forgotten her newfound skills by then.  So look out anyone who's within throwing distance of my daughter next winter.  Your face might be getting cold and wet very quickly.

Oh yes, Raianne is having fun with her new family members as well as you can see.

It's not just the cousins close to her own age she's having fun with.  She enjoys spending time with her new grandmother too.  While we were playing cribbage together, Raianne drew this picture of grandma (who insists on being called 'babchi').

She loves to draw and draws often.  It shouldn't be hard to steer her in an artistic direction.

"Yes, we know your daughter is having fun.  But what about you and your wife??"

'What are I and my wife doing for fun since her arrival into Canada' you ask oh hypothetical person that I've concocted just for this blogpost.  Well, I won't post any grizzly details.  I'll just leave this here.

Skyrockets in flight indeed.

So anyway, that's been their first month in Canada.  I know there will be many many more great months and years to come.  I'll end this post with another of my wife's videos showing her and our daughter having fun in Rochdale Park.  Enjoy!

Thursday, April 25, 2019

Joe Prick

There's a new show on the inter webs called Joe Prick. I just embedded it's first episode in this blog post above.  It's some pretty funny stoner humour that I'm sure everybody's burnt out relative will love.  I did some fan art of Joe Prick himself just for the shits and giggles of it.

If you support this production and give Episode 1 lots of traffic, I'm sure many more episodes will follow.  If you have a problem with that then you're the equivalent of making love while Forrest Gump is standing right beside you: you're fucking close to stupid!

"Well now! That was uncalled for!"

Perhaps.  Whatever.  Just feel free to enjoy the show.

Sunday, April 07, 2019

Ant Pasted - Commentary

A while back on this blog I posted a video in which I did some commentary on a WB cartoon with the good people at Ferris Wheelhouse.  Well, embedded above is some more commentary I did but this time for the Elmer Fudd cartoon Ant Pasted.

What a neat coincidence that I got to talk about this cartoon in particular because it allowed me to revisit a theory I have about this cartoon that I posted on this very same blog a way long time ago.  I opined that this cartoon was a subversive satirical attack on Joe McCarty's communist witch hunt.


I'll walk you through my thought process with screen captures this time (something I couldn't do for that old post).  {begin animation nerd dissertation now}

The cartoon starts with Elmer Fudd celebrating the 4th of July by lighting fireworks and throwing them.  Elmer Fudd represents Joe McCarthy and the fireworks represent Joe's aggressively overt patriotism.

However, one of Elmer's fireworks lands next to an ant colony injuring one of the ants.  The ant, in this moment, represents an average American citizen does not quite share the same zeal as Mr. McCarthy and so feels overwhelmed by it.

When Elmer sees his fireworks have disturbed the ants, he's inspired to throw several of his lighted explosives directly at the ants.  This of course represents McCarthy's Human Unamerican Activities Committee going after anyone they considered "communist subversives" (whether they had evidence or not).

Although one aspect is different from the real history of that era.  Back then, anyone who found themselves snared by the HUAC net had no choice but to go along with the proceedings which would get them blacklisted in some way.  In the cartoon in question here, the ants answer this onslaught with full militarized retaliation.

My comparison to McCarthy with this cartoon is further solidified for me when at one point during the battle Elmer Fudd shouts "Why don't you ant go under gwound where you bewong!"

I mean, that's why Joe started his crusade in the first place, so that he could drive all he considered undesirable to go underground and (to his hope) out of society.

But, like I said, the ants retaliate against Elmer in a highly successful attack that has Fudd running for his safety.

His retreat is all for naught because the ants manage to obliterate him with his own explosives. The cartoon ends with the ants throwing a patriotic salute to Elmer's (Joe's) destruction.

It would be of no surprise to me if my hypothesis of Ant Pasted were proved correct.  One of McCarthy's biggest target of interest was Hollywood, which the WB animation department was very much a part of.  You can bet everyone there was worried that no stone would be left unturned and soon HUAC would be coming after them.  I do think they did throw in some nods to patriotism for the soul purpose of keeping these men away from them.

One example I can think of off the top of my head is Forward March Hare in which Bugs Bunny accidentally joins the army.  When the general informs Bugs that the army is not equipped to accommodate rabbits as soldiers, Bugs responds with, "Isn't there something a patriotic rabbit can do for his country?"  I'm sure Joe pleasured himself after hearing Bugs say that.

Another example I recall is a gag in the cartoon Fowl Weather.  Sylvester cranks up a little toy soldier and sets it marching in front of the hens in the henhouse.  The hens all stand up to salute.  This gives Sylvester a chance to look for Tweety who may be hiding among the baby chicks (spoiler: he was).  Although, I think this may have been another subtle jab at Joe.

And of course there are the three cartoons that were commissioned to be economic lessons:

By Word of Mouse

Heir Conditioned

and Yankee Dood It

I looked through some of the comments of that video and found this dissenting assertion that I'd like to address:

OK, whoever made this comment (I cropped out the name so nobody finds and harasses this guy) contradicts himself a bit.  He says that the president ant declaring war may be a caricature of Harry Truman since he was president when production of this cartoon began at some point in the early 1950's but was released after Eisenhower had since won the 1952 election by the time of its release in 1953.  However, he then claims this cartoon was more about the Korean War coming to an end.  Ant Pasted was released May 9 of 1953 while the Korean War was halted with a cease fire in September of that year.  How could the director Friz Freeing be inspired to make a cartoon about the end of the Korean War at a time when Truman was still president and still determined to keep that war going? And yet he thought my comparison to Joe McCarthy was "off base" even though that was a deeply pressing concern in that time period starting way further back in the late 40's.  Meh.  What's the point of addressing this guy's ramblings any further?

Forget it, Jake. It's the Youtube comment section.

Well really neither of our statements hold much weight because who knows what the director of Ant Pasted, Friz Freleng, would say about our hypotheses if through some miracle of science he could still be alive today.  Maybe he would say "No, this cartoon was me telling Arthur Godfrey that he's a son of a bitch and should stay away from my wife."  But we'll never know, and what does it matter in the grand scheme of time and space?  No matter whose assessment is true or not, I think most animation enthusiasts can agree that many of the WB cartoons are some of the best and most clever short films of all time.  The fact that different people can read different things into what are essentially basic premises whose structure is used as a showcase for quick gags.  That's all part of their genius.  Whatever your opinion is, definitely continue to enjoy the cartoon Ant Pasted with or without commentary.

Happy viewing!!!

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

A look at Tex Avery's swan song

Today is Tex Avery's 111th birthday.  Like I've done on this blog for many years, I will use this day to talk about Tex and his great body of work.  This year, I've chosen to give my overview of the very last cartoon he ever worked on, The Kwicky Koala Show.

Before I do, I'd first like to say that it is unfair to compare this show to the forever classic work Tex did for WB and/or MGM.  For one thing, the theatrical cartoons made in the '30's and '40's had a different schedule than the TV cartoons starting from the late '50's onward to today.  For instance, I read that Bill Hanna and Joe Barbera had to make 10 Tom & Jerry cartoons every year.  Each one was about 7 minutes long and cost about $30,000 each to make.  When Bill & Joe had to produce animation for television, they had to make 26 cartoons per year.  Each one cost only $9000 and was about 26 minutes long.  So they and every other animation studio producing animation for TV had to streamline their production so as to get the very basic semblance of movement as possible while staying within their meagre budgets.  Tex Avery had to do the exact same thing when he started working on Kwicky Koala in 1979.

Another big factor was the management system.  At Warner Bros. for instance the boss Leon Schlesinger gave Tex and all his artists so much freedom to do their creative work.  He'd quickly enter and leave many storyboard sessions saying "you guys know what you're doing" and that was that.  Of course, the one time Leon DID interfere with Tex (the debacle with The Heckling Hare) is when things got rocky and Tex ultimately left for MGM.  There at MGM he had to deal with Fred Quimby.  Fred did not like cartoons at all and could not understand the people who made them.  But at the same time, I think he was a man who knew better than to interfere with something that was profitable.  So, much like with Schlesinger, Tex was basically free to play with his creations at MGM.
Flash foreward to 1979 now.  Sure, fellow animators Bill Hanna and Joe Barbera are running that studio and would gladly give Tex all the creative elbow room he asks for.  However, there are other people with huge clout looming over their studio that need to be appeased, such as TV executives from various networks as well as various PTA activist groups putting demands on the content.

For instance, around that time Hanna Barbera was producing a Popeye show for Saturday morning.  Of course, the fist fighting between Popeye and Bluto had to either be toned down severely or gone entirely.  Then yet another imposition was made with Olive Oyl.  The activists of the day felt that Popeye and Bluto fighting over Olive was demeaning to her.  So everybody's wings were sufficiently clipped for that show.  As stiflingly bad as things were back then, this kind of authoritarian censorship has gotten worse over the years, especially in the UK.

But I digress.  The point is that Tex Avery was not working in the same kind of environment as he was during the golden age and so could only work with the resources that he had.  So, I will now talk about the Kwicky Koala Show and give my assessment of it.

The main star is of course Kwicky Koala.

He's basically a mild mannered unassuming type of milquetoast everyman.  His big gimmick though is that he can disappear and reappear at will.  Especially when that dastardly Wilford Wolf is after him.

Wilford makes his move....

....misses Kwicky completely because the little marsupial has disappeared...

Kwicky then reappears in a whole new location leaving Wilford with a dumbfounded look on his face.  That is pretty much every exchange Kwicky and Wilford have with each other.  Or, as Cecil Turtle might say...
"I do that kind of stuff to him all through the series"

Despite the repetition, it's a fun show to watch.  Wilford Wolf is voiced by John Stevenson and you can tell he's having so much fun doing that voice too.  It must have been a nice change of pace for him after doing the voices of stuffy authority figures like Mr Slate or every policeman and butler in every Hanna Barbera show ever.
This show has other characters as well:

There's also Crazy Claws.  His personality is based entirely from Groucho Marx.  He has a similar voice, makes similar wise cracks, and (true to Groucho form) he would retract any wise cracks he thought weren't good enough.  All the while he's out smarting a prospector with a dog that laughs like Muttley.  There's also a park ranger that has had it up to here with all of them.  He's fun to watch for that reason alone.

Next is Dirty Dawg.  He's kind of a smooth talking homeless dog that's always trying to talk himself into a free meal whenever he can.  He has a friend named Ratzo and they're both chased by an angry police officer.  I personally wasn't as into this one as I was the other two shows here.  It's too bad because Frank Welker does an excellent job as the voice of Dirty Dawg and you can all he's having so much fun with this character.  Maybe Tex didn't give as much attention to this character? I don't know.

In-between the shows are short vignettes of the Bungle Brothers.  They're trying to break into show business with a vaudeville act................... in 1979.  They might as well try to get a job riding for the Pony Express while they're at it.  I guess the main joke of these guys is that they're so hopelessly behind the times and/or they've been trying for their big break ever since vaudeville was relevant and still hold out hope of playing the big stages in Peoria and Cucamonga.

After watching that entire series, I'm hard pressed to pick out which parts Tex worked on and which parts he didn't.
For one thing, he sadly died part way through production.  On August 26, 1980 Tex staggered into work with his face a sickly shade of green.  He didn't know it then, but that green complexion was there because his liver was failing after decades of heavy binge drinking.  Bill Hanna found him and rushed him to he hospital as quickly as he could.  But, nothing could be done to save him.  Tex left us that day.  So, the rest of the episodes were completed by the remaining crew.  The Kwicky Koala show debuted in the early autumn of 1981.
Also, from my own experience of working on animated shows, I know that they don't always begin production with the first episode.  A lot of times the first episode the crew works on is somewhere in the middle like ep10 or 14.  That way the crew has a chance to get a good feel for the show while making their mistakes.  Then, when the crew feels confident in their abilities and well as how the show will be, then they work on the first episode so they can debut the show with their best efforts.  The theory being that when the TV audience is dazzled by the first episode then they're more likely to forgive any mistakes in later episodes.
So, which episodes had Tex done work on before the day of his passing? Your guess is as good as mine.  It would be great if any living artist who worked on that show could give their insight of their experience that would be great and super helpful.

I will end this post with a Kwicky episode that Tex Avery may or may not have worked on, but it certainly has a story structure similar to cartoons Tex did in the past like The Blow Out and Dumb Hounded.  I'd like to think Tex so much of his time on this one, but again clarification of that would be helpful.

Either way, enjoy.  Also, happy birthday, Tex, wherever you are.

Wednesday, January 09, 2019

My response to a Trump tweet

I slapped together this little diorama in response to a stupid STUPID tweet that actual American president one Donald J Trump made some time ago (yes I know, one of sooooooooooo many).  For context, here's the tweet I'm talking about:


Although I do agree with Trump's point about the news.  Way too much of it is a parade of pseudo activists telling us they're journalists and reading their purposefully skewed interpretation of the news through the filter of a most undemocratic ideology.  It's like this with news organizations in America and all over the world.  Ideally, the news should just be objective facts such as:

This just in: Trump did a thing

Then that can be followed by a separate opinion piece given in such a way that it is obvious to even a 4 year old that this is a separate opinion piece.

"In my opinion, that thing Trump did was stupid"

That's how the news media should be.  Really, we shouldn't even know a news anchor's political point of view.  That sort of thing should remain a cryptic mystery that we never need to solve.
Of course, the biggest problem with Trump's lashing out at the news media is that he only seems to pick on CNN when they do it.  Yes, CNN is disgusting in it's deliberate partisan spin.  However, so are all the other news outlets.  Fox and InfoWars put their own ideological spin on news events as well, but Trump thinks those news orgs are 'just fine'.  That shows right there that Trump is not at all concerned about news being accurate or factual.  Some who have worked with him have said that he demands loyalty from everyone he encounters, and this behaviour of his certainly proves that.

But that's not the most egregious part of Trump's tweet. It's the stuff he said about Saturday Night Live that I want to talk about here. As you can see in the graphic of his tweet above, I already gave a bit of a response to him.  Now I'd like to elaborate on that point some more in this blog post.

The show Saturday Night Live, as many fans of the show can tell you, has always been about political satire and it's most frequent target has always been the US president.  The most notable examples are:

Chevy Chase as Gerald Ford

Dana Carvey as George Bush Sr

Will Ferrell as George Bush Jr

And Jay Pharaoh as Barack Obama. I'm not sure how much press Jay got from playing Obama exactly.  I just think he did a very excellent job with his portrayal so I added him here.

The 1st Amendment of the US Constitution gives Saturday Night Live more than enough leeway to portray a sitting president, or any public figure, any way they want.  They have no obligation to be accurate or even fair.  They only have to be funny and thereby entertain an audience.  Everyone knows they not a credible source of information.  Is there a samurai warrior running various businesses in New York?  Did alien Coneheads really land on Earth in order to observe our lifestyles?  Did a cable access show hosted by a teenager named Wayne Campbell actually manage to get the band Aerosmith to show up and perform in his parent's basement?  Did Patrick Swayze really learn all of his Chippendale dance moves from Chris Farley?  Of course, it doesn't matter if any of those things can be true or not because it's just fun to watch them be acted out by skilled performers.
The guy in charge, Lorne Michaels, as well as anyone who may take over his position in the future, can run the show any way they want as long as they have good ratings and thus continue to be an asset for NBC. That being said, I certainly hope that NBC executives have absolute zero control over how the show is run.  The writers and cast really should have at least 95% control of the show's content.  If I don't want some anonymous jag off in a suit at NBC to have sway on what SNL can do then I certainly don't want the high office of the president dictating their contents either.
So, I say this to Mr. Trump. If you don't care for what SNL is doing now be it their portrayal of you or any other news related sketches they've done, just simply don't watch the show.  They have every right to do what they're doing and are under no obligation to regard your feelings at all.  Back off from them and get back to work.

I know it's unprofessional to explain jokes I've made, but sadly I'm thinking I might have to do that right now.  Any big fan of Saturday Night Live probably knows already what particular sketch I'm referring to with that "Trump Maquette" up at the top.  However, for those of you unfamiliar, such as an millennial or Gen Z person who's young enough to think that Bobby Moynihan is part of the original cast, I'll just spill it here.  That thing I made is a reference to Mr. Bill

Mr. Bill was a little plasticine figure that would always get tortured by his "friend" Mr. Hands.  It was and is hilarious.  So, for the benefit of everyone, I've embedded an episode of Mr Bill below.  Enjoy.  And, Mr. Trump, try to gain some perspective, OK.